Damitha Abeyratne’s Name Excluded from SJB Nominations: A Political Controversy

Share This

Discover the controversy surrounding actress Damitha Abeyratne’s exclusion from the SJB Ratnapura District nominations, her reaction, and the impact on Sri Lankan politics. Explore the legal and political implications in this in-depth analysis


 

Introduction: Damitha Abeyratne’s Political Journey

Damitha Abeyratne, widely known for her roles as an actress, has recently made headlines not for her performances on screen but for her involvement in Sri Lankan politics. Over the years, Abeyratne transitioned from a popular figure in entertainment to a prominent supporter of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB). Her active participation in rallies and political campaigns marked her as a vocal advocate for the party’s ideals, earning her respect among supporters. However, the recent controversy surrounding her exclusion from the SJB nominations list for the Ratnapura District in the upcoming General Election has thrown her political future into uncertainty.

The Controversy Surrounding Ratnapura District Nominations

On October 11, 2024, Damitha Abeyratne arrived at the Ratnapura District Secretariat, ready to sign her nomination papers for the Samagi Jana Balawegaya. However, she was informed that her name was not included in the final list of candidates. This news came as a shock to Abeyratne, who had been preparing to represent the SJB in the district. Just a day prior, she had publicly confirmed her candidacy, leading to questions about why her name was removed at the last moment.

Hesha Vithanage’s Statement
Hesha Vithanage’s Statement

Hesha Vithanage, the Ratnapura District Group Leader for the SJB, addressed the situation by stating that the district members decided against including Abeyratne in the nominations. According to Vithanage, the decision was based on a preference for candidates from within the district, highlighting a desire to avoid “outsiders” in the race. Vithanage acknowledged Abeyratne’s significant contributions to the party but maintained that the decision was a collective one made by the district members.

 

Damitha’s Reaction and Allegations of Fundamental Rights Violations

Damitha Abeyratne did not take this decision lightly. In her statements to the press, she expressed her disappointment and claimed that her fundamental rights had been violated. She emphasized her commitment to the SJB and her willingness to contest the election, regardless of the district. Abeyratne explained that she never specifically requested to run in Ratnapura, but had been approached by Vithanage, who encouraged her to consider the district due to its lack of female political leaders.

Legal Action Looming?

Abeyratne has indicated that she plans to pursue legal action against the SJB, accusing the party of sidelining her unjustly. She stated that she had substantial evidence to support her claims and would not hesitate to take the matter to court. Her complaint has already been filed with the Election Commission, setting the stage for what could become a prolonged legal battle.

The Role of Women in Politics: Lack of Representation in Ratnapura District

One of the critical issues that this controversy brings to light is the lack of female representation in politics, particularly in the Ratnapura District. Abeyratne herself noted that there were few, if any, women in prominent political roles in the district. This lack of representation could have been a key reason for her interest in running for office there, and her exclusion raises important questions about gender equality within the party.

SJB’s Decision-Making Process

While the SJB has not provided a detailed explanation for why Abeyratne’s name was removed from the list, it is clear that internal party dynamics played a significant role. The decision to focus on local candidates could reflect a broader strategy, but it also risks alienating supporters who value diversity and inclusivity. For many, Abeyratne’s removal is not just a personal setback for her, but a missed opportunity for the SJB to promote greater gender representation.

What’s Next for Damitha Abeyratne?

With her name removed from the nominations list, Damitha Abeyratne’s political future remains uncertain. However, she has made it clear that she will not be stepping away from politics. Her commitment to the SJB, coupled with her determination to seek justice through legal channels, suggests that she will remain an influential figure in Sri Lanka’s political landscape.

Potential Legal Action

If Abeyratne follows through with her threat of legal action, it could set a precedent for how political parties handle internal disputes, particularly concerning candidate nominations. Her case could shine a spotlight on the rights of candidates within political parties and the importance of transparency in the nomination process.

Public Response and Media Coverage

The removal of Damitha Abeyratne’s name from the SJB nominations list has sparked widespread media coverage and public debate. Supporters of Abeyratne have taken to social media to express their disappointment, with many questioning the party’s decision. The controversy has also drawn attention to the broader issue of how political parties in Sri Lanka handle nominations and the transparency (or lack thereof) in the process.

Media’s Role in Shaping Perceptions

The media has played a critical role in shaping public perceptions of the controversy. Coverage of the incident has highlighted the tension within the SJB, with some outlets focusing on the party’s internal struggles, while others emphasize Abeyratne’s fight for justice. The ongoing coverage will likely continue to influence how the public views both Abeyratne and the SJB in the lead-up to the General Election.

Conclusion

Damitha Abeyratne’s exclusion from the SJB’s nominations list for the Ratnapura District has ignited a political controversy that goes beyond a single candidate’s aspirations. It raises important questions about the role of women in politics, the transparency of political parties, and the broader dynamics of Sri Lanka’s electoral system. As Abeyratne prepares to take legal action, her fight for justice could have lasting implications for the political landscape in Sri Lanka.


10 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Who is Damitha Abeyratne?

Damitha Abeyratne is a renowned Sri Lankan actress who has recently become involved in politics, particularly as a supporter of the Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB).

2. Why was Damitha Abeyratne’s name removed from the SJB nominations?

Her name was excluded from the Ratnapura District nominations list, reportedly due to the party’s decision to prioritize local candidates.

3. Has Damitha Abeyratne taken legal action?

Yes, Damitha has filed a complaint with the Election Commission and plans to pursue legal action, citing a violation of her fundamental rights.

4. What district was Damitha supposed to represent?

Damitha Abeyratne was expected to represent the Ratnapura District in the upcoming General Election.

5. What role does Hesha Vithanage play in the controversy?

Hesha Vithanage is the Ratnapura District Group Leader for the SJB and played a significant role in the decision not to include Damitha in the nominations list.

6. What are Damitha Abeyratne’s next steps in politics?

Despite the setback, Damitha has stated that she remains committed to politics and plans to pursue legal action to challenge her exclusion.

7. How has the public reacted to Damitha’s removal?

The public reaction has been mixed, with some expressing disappointment at the SJB’s decision, while others support the party’s focus on local candidates.

8. What does Damitha Abeyratne say about women’s representation in Ratnapura?

Damitha has highlighted the lack of female representation in the Ratnapura District and expressed her desire to change that.

9. Is there a possibility that Damitha could be reinstated as a candidate?

While it’s unclear if she could be reinstated, Damitha’s legal challenge could potentially lead to further discussions within the SJB about her candidacy.

10. What impact could this controversy have on the SJB?

The controversy could affect the SJB’s public image, particularly regarding its commitment to transparency and gender representation in politics.