Sri Lanka Customs in Hot Seat: Why Were 323 Containers Let Go Without Inspection?

Share This

Sri Lanka Customs denies risks in 323 containers release. Were illegal goods involved? Explore the explosive allegations and official response.


A recent decision by Sri Lanka Customs to release 323  containers without physical inspections has ignited a firestorm of accusations, denials, and public debate. The controversy, which erupted on social media and escalated with opposition party involvement, centers on allegations of potential smuggling, corruption, and political interference. Sri Lanka Customs swiftly issued an eight-point clarification denying risks of illegal goods entering the country or revenue losses, while Western Province Governor Hanif Yusoof faced—and vehemently rejected—claims of personal involvement. This article unpacks the drama, separates facts from rumors, and explores what this incident means for Sri Lanka’s trade governance and public trust.


821574492-Sri-Lanka-Customs-Statement-01-29-2025 by mlmalaviarachchi on Scribd

The Backstory: How Customs Procedures Normally Work

To understand the controversy, we first need to know how Sri Lanka Customs operates. When goods arrive at ports, a risk assessment system selects containers for physical checks. High-risk shipments (based on origin, importer history, or product type) are inspected for contraband like drugs, weapons, or undervalued items that could cheat taxes. Most containers, however, are cleared after document reviews and electronic scans. This system balances security with efficiency, ensuring trade flows smoothly while minimizing risks.


The Controversy Explained: 323 Containers Released Without Checks

In late January 2025, Sri Lanka Customs released 323 containers flagged for inspection, bypassing physical examinations. Opposition lawmakers and social media users alleged that this move allowed dangerous or illegal goods—including weapons, gold, or narcotics—to enter the country. Critics also speculated that the state lost millions in potential tax revenue due to undervalued imports.

Customs’ Eight-Point Defense:

  1. No Link to Expolanka Holdings: The department clarified that none of the containers were tied to Expolanka, a major logistics firm.
  2. Zero Risk of Contraband: Advanced scanning and data analysis ensured no threats slipped through.
  3. No Revenue Loss: All import taxes were calculated accurately using verified documentation.
  4. System Overload Justified Decision: A surge in port congestion and delays forced authorities to prioritize inspections selectively.
  5. Legal Compliance: The release followed international customs protocols.

Despite these assurances, public skepticism grew. Why were so many containers exempted? Could the system be manipulated?


Governor Hanif Yusoof’s Role: Allegations and Denials

The plot thickened when social media users accused Western Province Governor Hanif Yusoof of links to the released containers. Opposition figures alleged a company connected to him had imported goods in the unchecked shipments.

Yusoof’s Response:

  • “No Connection”: The governor told Ada Derana he had “no involvement” with the containers.
  • Political Motives? He dismissed the claims as “baseless rumors” spread by rivals, stressing he has “no political ambitions” beyond serving citizens.
  • Focus on Development: Yusoof highlighted his work on Western Province infrastructure and welfare programs, urging critics to focus on facts.

While Yusoof’s rebuttal was firm, the incident raises questions about how easily public figures can become targets in high-stakes scandals.


Opposition’s Claims: Smoke Without Fire?

Opposition parties argue that the Customs Department’s explanation lacks transparency. Key concerns include:

  • Why Expedite 323 Containers? If port congestion was the issue, why not address delays systemically?
  • Past Scandals: Sri Lanka has faced customs corruption cases before, like the 2017 heroin-in-container bust. Citizens wonder: Could history repeat itself?
  • Accountability Gaps: Who authorized the releases, and what safeguards prevent abuse?

“This isn’t just about 323 containers—it’s about whether our systems are foolproof,” said opposition MP Nalin Bandara. “We demand an independent audit.”


Analytical Deep Dive: Implications for Sri Lanka

  1. Trade Reputation: Smooth customs processes are vital for Sri Lanka’s goal to become a regional trade hub. Scandals could deter investors.
  2. Public Trust: With memories of the 2022 economic crisis still fresh, citizens are wary of governance lapses.
  3. Political Fallout: The allegations against Yusoof, whether true or not, highlight how quickly officials can become collateral damage in controversies.

A customs official (speaking anonymously) admitted, “We’re understaffed and overwhelmed. Sometimes, shortcuts backfire.”


What’s Next? Calls for Reform and Transparency

To rebuild trust, experts suggest:

  • Digital Upgrades: Invest in AI-driven risk assessment tools to reduce human error.
  • Public Reports: Publish monthly data on inspected/released containers.
  • Whistleblower Protection: Encourage customs staff to report irregularities without fear.

“Transparency isn’t optional—it’s essential,” said trade analyst Shamila Fernando. “Every unchecked container erodes confidence.”


A Crisis of Confidence or Much Ado About Nothing?

While Sri Lanka Customs insists no laws were broken, the court of public opinion remains divided. For now, the controversy underscores a universal truth: In an era of instant information and viral rumors, perception often outweighs facts. Whether this incident fades away or sparks larger reforms depends on how authorities balance efficiency with accountability moving forward.


  • Why were 323 containers released without inspection by Sri Lanka Customs?
    Due to port congestion and operational delays, Customs prioritized selective inspections using advanced scanning and documentation checks. They claim no security or revenue risks occurred.
  • Was Expolanka Holdings linked to the released containers?
    No. Sri Lanka Customs explicitly stated none of the 323 containers were tied to Expolanka Holdings.
  • What risks do unchecked containers pose to Sri Lanka?
    Critics fear smuggled goods (weapons, drugs, gold) or tax evasion. Customs insists their digital systems prevented such risks.
  • Why is Governor Hanif Yusoof involved in this controversy?
    Social media rumors falsely alleged a company linked to him imported goods in the containers. Yusoof denied any connection.
  • Did Sri Lanka lose tax revenue due to this decision?
    Customs claims no revenue loss, as taxes were calculated using verified import documents.
  • What are the opposition’s main concerns?
    They demand transparency, an independent audit, and accountability for bypassing physical inspections.
  • Has Sri Lanka faced similar customs scandals before?
    Yes, including a 2017 case where heroin was found in a container. This history fuels public skepticism.
  • How might this incident impact Sri Lanka’s trade reputation?
    Repeated scandals could deter foreign investors and delay the country’s goal of becoming a regional trade hub.
  • What reforms are experts suggesting?
    Upgrading to AI-driven risk assessments, publishing inspection data, and protecting whistleblowers.
  • How can the public stay updated on this issue?
    Follow official Customs statements, independent audits (if ordered), and credible media reports.